etaf/docs/proposals/module-boundaries.en.md
2026-08-26 01:40:42 +08:00

7.4 KiB

ETAF Module Responsibilities and Target Architecture (Unimplemented Proposal)

Status: design proposal. This is not the current public API or a delivered implementation. The current contract remains architecture.en.md, user-guide.en.md, and the passing tests.

This proposal defines clean-slate ownership boundaries for ETAF, Ebox, ECSS, TP, etaf-ui, etaf-sqlite, the performance recorder, and both Playgrounds. It describes the target architecture; current compatibility names are not treated as the architecture itself.

The target parts below are not delivered API until code, tests, and real benchmarks prove them. This proposal does not change the current Host registry, View grammar, or package dependencies.

1. Minimal stable model

ETAF has four representations:

Component semantics and ownership
    ↓
Text / Box View structure
    ↓
Ebox geometry and render plan
    ↓
TP / Emacs final submission

The public concepts are:

Concept Owns Does not own
Text text content, typography, inline properties, wrapping input subtree layout, business state, lifecycle
Box size, surface, children, and layout Component identity, Data, Actions
Component reusable semantics, props, slots, state, Context, Actions, lifecycle pixel measurement and layout algorithms

Host is an internal Renderer term for a primitive lowered to a backend. It is not a third public visual taxonomy. An Ebox Node is a lower-level geometry/render object.

The target View model is:

View = Text(content, typography)
     | Box(layout, surface, children)
     | ComponentCall(props, slots)

The Box layout modes exposed by the target ETAF API are a closed set:

column | row | flex | grid

A Box with multiple children must have an arrangement rule; the target ETAF contract defaults that arrangement to column (vertical stacking). Children are arranged only by column, row, flex, or grid. Text owns text measurement, wrapping, and inline runs, so the target model does not need a separate flow layout algorithm. Current Ebox marks its ordinary content path with (block flow); that is a historical implementation marker, not a required target algorithm or module.

(box "text") is shorthand for (box (text "text")). ETAF must not expose (box :content "text"); :content remains an Ebox backend field.

ETAF also does not define a public spacer type. A Box with no children is an empty Box; Ebox may use an empty-node representation or private helper, but users do not need another visual category.

2. Module responsibilities

ETAF Core

etaf-view owns the View grammar, Text/Box/Component-call normalization, property and slot shape validation, expression boundaries, and Component registration. It does not measure pixels, lay out nodes, write buffers, or implement business data.

etaf-component owns etaf-define-component, :view, :setup, :styles, and definition validation. It does not own Runtime scheduling or Ebox nodes.

etaf-runtime owns retained identity, reactive refs/computed/effects/watchers, Scope cleanup, Context/Theme, Actions, Behaviors, Data, Resources, lifecycle, invalidation, transactions, commit, and rollback. It does not own pixel layout or Ebox private state.

etaf-renderer is the only ETAF-to-Ebox lowering boundary. It translates Text, Box, and Component output to public Ebox constructors and carries resolved style/paint contributions downstream. It does not own Component lifecycle or data requests.

Ebox

Ebox is the layout and rendering engine, not the ETAF Component Runtime. It owns text measurement, wrapping, row/column/flex/grid geometry, surface/scroll geometry, stable layout snapshots, and render/paint plans. It does not know Components, slots, Context, Actions, Behaviors, Data, or Resources.

Logically it has two boundaries:

ebox-core       pure measurement, layout, snapshots, and render plans
ebox-emacs      font/window capabilities and Emacs buffer submission

They need not be separate distribution packages immediately, but geometry and Emacs side effects must not become one responsibility.

ECSS and TP

ECSS owns selectors, declarations, cascade, inheritance, and computed styles. It does not own Runtime state, layout, or buffer writes.

TP owns layered Emacs text-property/paint slots, priority merging, atomic application, journaling, and rollback. It does not parse selectors, measure layout, or execute Components.

Optional/application packages

etaf-ui owns reusable Button, Checkbox, Label, Panel, Number input, DataGrid, and Pagination Components. It does not implement another Runtime or layout engine.

etaf-sqlite owns SQLite connections, schema/query/mutation validation, paging, and Data Source disposal. It does not own Data Controller state or UI.

The performance recorder owns application-neutral operation/stage records, summaries, environment context, and export. It observes public boundaries and never embeds a Playground name or changes the measured render path.

ebox-playground only validates public Ebox layout APIs. etaf-playground validates ETAF composition and may optionally load etaf-ui and etaf-sqlite; neither Playground owns framework protocols. A static .etaf manifest belongs to the Playground unless a future compiler lowers it to the same Text/Box/Component contract.

3. Dependency direction

etaf-ui ───────▶ ETAF Core ───────▶ Ebox public layout port
etaf-sqlite ──▶ ETAF Data contract
etaf-playground ─▶ ETAF + optional UI/SQLite
ebox-playground ─▶ Ebox public API only
performance ───▶ public probes only

Ebox never depends upward on ETAF. TP never parses View trees. ECSS never writes buffers. UI never calls private Ebox functions. SQLite never knows UI. Playgrounds never inject example protocols into core.

4. Rust and Elisp split

Rust is for deterministic, environment-independent computation: normalized Render IR, keyed diff/patch, ECSS cascade, text measurement/wrapping, ordinary Box/flex/grid layout, geometry snapshots, and paint-contribution merging.

Elisp/Emacs owns user Component execution, refs, Context, Actions, Data, Resources, lifecycle callbacks, Emacs events/windows/fonts, and final patch submission. Elisp must not reimplement Rust layout/cascade/diff; Rust must not read Emacs buffers or understand Component slots.

5. Invariants and evolution

One transaction materializes stable identity, dependencies, layout snapshots, and paint contributions once. Text paint changes do not rerun unrelated Components or layout. Box geometry changes affect only the required layout owner. Component state/slot/list changes affect only the owner of that structure. Failed Ebox/TP candidates preserve the last committed result.

The clean public direction is Text + Box(layout) + Component. If concise syntax is needed, row/column/flex/grid may be introduced as new compiler sugar, but they are not compatibility aliases and must not become Runtime Components. fragment is transparent structure. spacer and flow are not public ETAF types; the target Ebox may replace the current (block flow) marker with ordinary Box/Text paths instead of retaining a separate flow branch. The redesign does not preserve the old Host registry names or add a compatibility layer. This target is not implemented merely by documenting it.